Registered: 07/19/11 Posts: 12,399
Reply with quote #1
Bob Unruh says there always have been those few who have launched diatribes over the dictatorial actions of any given U.S. presidential administration, over civil rights, foreign affairs, the economy, the draft or a dozen other topics -- even though the Constitution was written specifically to prevent the collection of too much power by one branch of government.
Now, again, there are words like "egocentric megalomaniac" being ascribed to the White House, and warnings about detention camps and government surveillance of its citizens.
But where previous generations of warnings emanated from lone wolves with their fax machines in dusty spare rooms, the current alarms are being issued by the likes of Investors Business Daily, First Amendment authority Nat Hentoff, New York Times best-selling author Robert Ringer and their equals.
"A second term free of electoral restraints [for Obama] may be a frightening prospect," IBD wrote in a commentary in the last week. "This is, after all, a president who has said he can’t wait for Congress to act and will govern by executive order and regulations if necessary. He has questioned the Supreme Court’s ‘unprecedented’ review of Obamacare." The publication pointed out that the Obama administration already is in contempt of court -- in a court dispute over its ban on oil drilling rigs in the Gulf of Mexico. When U.S. District Judge Martin Feldman ruled that the Obama Interior Department unconstitutionally imposed an offshore drilling moratorium, the agency "simply established a second ban that was virtually identical." "Judge Feldman was not amused. ‘Each step the government took following the court’s imposition of a preliminary injunction showcases its defiance,’ Feldman said in his ruling. ‘Such dismissive conduct, viewed in tandem with the re-imposition of a second moratorium …. provides this court with clear and convincing evidence of its contempt,’" the editorial said. The issue recently was brought into the headlines by comments from Judge Andrew Napolitano, a Fox News analyst who said, "I think the president is dangerously close to totalitarianism. A few months ago he was saying the Congress doesn’t count. The Congress doesn’t mean anything. I am going to rule by decree and by administrative regulation. Now he’s basically saying the Supreme Court doesn’t count. It doesn’t matter what they think. They can’t review our legislation. "That would leave just him as the only branch of government standing," Napolitano said. His comments came after statements from Obama that the U.S. Supreme Court wouldn’t take the "unprecedented" action of actually overturning the Obamacare law, even though that is exactly what courts do when justices determine the legislation is unconstitutional. "I think he [Obama] has some problems with understanding the Constitution, or accepting limitations on his power," said Napolitano. "Look, they’re equal branches of government, but with respect to what the law means and what the Constitution means, the court is superior to the president." His comments came recently on Neil Cavuto’s program, when the discussion turned to the U.S. Supreme Court’s discussion of the unconstitutionality of Obamacare and Obama’s verbal attack on the court shortly after the oral arguments. Napolitano said ( video):
"No president in modern times has questioned [the Supreme Court's] authority. They have questioned the way the authority has been exercised,” he said. "Not their right to make the decision.
"This is an extreme view of the Supreme Court and the Constitution, one that has not been articulated since Andrew Jackson was in the White House,” he said. Other warnings that have been issued:
Erik Rush, a columnist and author of sociopolitical fare, including “Negrophilia: From Slave Block to Pedestal – America’s Racial Obsession,” wrote about the New Black Panthers, and how their “advancing Marxist agenda is being not-so-subtly choreographed from Barack Obama’s White House.”
“Civil unrest is an Obama administration objective, since it will facilitate crises sufficient for the president to justify suspensions of civil rights. Provisions in the National Defense Authorization Act, Obama’s recent National Defense Resources Preparedness executive order, as well as others, have certainly paved the way for such action.
“The question of a fair election in November is also something that deserves our attention. We can take it as given that voter fraud will abound at the hands of ACORN and other like-minded fringe organizations … All of this illustrates the paramount importance of continuing to beat the drum of Obama’s communism in unequivocal terms, regardless of the mincing ridicule we will draw from liberals…”
Ringer wrote,“I began warning about Barack Obama’s dictatorial ambitions before he even won the 2008 presidential election … Obama’s recent contention that it would be ‘unprecedented’ for the Supreme Court to overrule congressional legislation had dictatorship written all over it.
“I will say yet again what I have been saying for more than three years: If polls indicate that Obama is going to win the upcoming election, no problem. He’ll keep flashing that fake Barry Obama grin until Nov. 7, then move swiftly to begin unleashing a dictatorial full monty – consisting of more regulations, higher taxes and less freedom – that will shock all but his staunchest Marxist allies.
Nothing will be off limits – a national police force, instant citizenship for all Third World people … forced equalization of income (except for Obama’s wealthy supporters), widespread use of tax audits to carry out vendettas against enemies … suspension of habeas corpus … and much, much more.
“On the other hand, two or three months before the election, if the polls clearly show that Obama is going to go down in defeat, I believe there’s better than a 50-50 chance of a major ‘emergency’ coincidentally making its appearance, convincingly manufactured in such a way as to cause the average entitlement junkie to agree that we must rally around the president and ‘postpone’ the November elections.”
Craige McMillan, longtime WND commentary author, said, “Why do you think Big Sis needs 20,000 drones patrolling the skies over America and NSA needs a new listening post to read and listen to every personal communication between every American citizen and archive it forever? … Step out of line and the police don’t even need a warrant to download your location data and buddy lists from your cell phone. Then they can go around and talk to your pals about your terrorist tendencies.” Nat Henthoff, nationally known authority on the First Amendment,wrote about plans to begin, starting in 2013, for the government to being monitoring and databasing “any form of communication.”
He described the new National Security Agency’s new Utah center – “more than five times larger than the U.S. Capitol” where “all forms of communication, including the complete contents of private emails, cellphone calls and Google searches, as well as all sorts of personal data trails – parking receipts, travel itineraries, bookstore purchases…” will be archived.
“We are not yet a police state. The First Amendment is still functioning … But with the NSA burrowing ceaselessly into our once very private lives, where are the reminders of the Declaration of Independence and its indictments of King George III?”
Mychal Massie, the chairman of the National Leadership Network of Black Conservatives, also is on record.”Many say Barack Obama is the most divisive, egocentric megalomaniac ever to hold his office. Others say he is the most ruthless and defiantly determined Marxist-Leninist ever to become president. I say he is, by definition and actions, both. Vox Day, WND columnist, wrote, “It is becoming increasingly clear that the federal government is completely and utterly out of control, spewing nonsense, issuing irrational threats and stumbling around the world stage like a belligerent drunk with an empty wallet … Americans no longer enjoy the limited government of their forefathers. They suffer from limitless government. TSA is an apt acronym. But it does not stand for the Transportation Security Administration; it stands for the Totalitarian State of America.
here . . .
Registered: 02/04/12 Posts: 72
Reply with quote #2
If no one has seen the videos, you should watch the videos. I know beckwith posted this, but he posted links. I posted the videos because I think that everyone should watch these videos. They are important. Here is the link to the whole column that Bob Unruh wrote.
http://www.wnd.com/2012/04/alarms-over-obama-coup-against-constitution-surging/. I love this guy, he always writes very clear and to the point. I think that he is always right. By the way, if anyone hasn't signed the petition to have congress investigate, here is the link: http://www.wnd.com/wnd_petition/petition-urging-congress-to-investigate-obamas-eligibility/
Here are Napolitano’s comments:
“No president in modern times has questioned [the Supreme Court's] authority. They have questioned the way the authority has been exercised,” he said. “Not their right to make the decision.
A video of his statements is posted here:
The opening of the Rand Corp. report was focused on providing “Stability Police Force” services outside of the U.S. borders. A company spokesman told WND that the report focused exclusively on the idea of a structure that could move into war-torn or riot-damaged cities or nations overseas and restore order.
Radio talk show Mark Levin discussed it in a broadcast:
He cited Obama’s statement at a dedication ceremony for a facility at the National Defense University.
There, Obama said, “American must also balance and integrate all elements of our national power. We cannot continue to push the burden onto our military alone, nor leave dormant any aspect of the full arsenal of American capability. That’s why my administration is committed to renewing diplomacy as a tool of American power and to developing our civilian national security capabilities.”
What? Levin said.
As the presidential campaign advanced in 2008, another video appeared online that for many crystallized their concerns over such a “corps.”
It shows a squad of young men marching and shouting praises to Obama: VIDEO
Rand officials said the study looked at the need for “a U.S. Stability Police Force, the major capabilities it would need if created, where in the federal government it would best be headquartered, and how it should be staffed.”
The federally funded research was done specifically for the U.S. Army.
The study also said, “Our analysis clearly indicates that the United States needs an SPF or some other way to accomplish the SPF mission.”
Registered: 09/25/11 Posts: 1,899
Reply with quote #3
This is pretty scary I give the links and the opening statement & Summary.
Link one is Robert Cody Judy's blog. Link two is the document. Long, but better, I think.
DE-CLASSIFIED USNORTHCOM OBAMA‟S MILITARY INDISCRETION Att: General Charles H. Jacoby, Jr. The time has come that our military commanders consider pressing charges against Mr. Barac k Obama. Our military men and women swear an oath to the Constitution, not to the office of the President that is occupied by a legitimate President who is qualified under the Constitution. They certainly do not swear an oath to an illegitimate president that includes at this time most especially one who mocks the very essence of what the military is sworn to. ...................................... SUMMARY In order to maintain the civil peace I believe it is incumbent upon our Military to ascertain the damage, isolate the offender from politically orchestrating greater collateral damage, and constitute a peaceful settlement on the chain of command being succinctly rendered as to maintain efficiency of the Military Order and the safety of the United States Citizenry. ................................................... WOW! How 'bout that, sports fans! I am VERY interested to hear opinions from serving or retired Senior Officers on this. I was only an Air Cav CWO-2 and only in for the war and the flight time, but I took the Oath seriously. Then and now.
Registered: 07/19/11 Posts: 12,399
Reply with quote #4
General Charles H. Jacoby, Jr.
General Charles H. Jacoby, Jr., USA (born June 1954) is an American Army officer who is currently serving as the fifth Commander, United States Northern Command (USNORTHCOM) and the 22nd Commander, North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD). Jacoby is the first Army officer to assume command of Northern Command. He previously served as the Director for Strategic Plans and Policy, The Joint Staff. He assumed his current assignment on August 3, 2011. A 1978 graduate of the United States Military Academy, General Jacoby attended the Infantry Officer Basic and Advanced courses, the Army Command and General Staff College, the School of Advanced Military Studies, and the National War College. He has a master’s degree in History from the University of Michigan. I find it hard to believe that the commander of a major command would write such a document. That it is sourced to the Huff-and-puffington Post is also curious. That said, if was indeed written and signed by General Jacoby it's a game changer -- primarily for the general's career. this document
Registered: 03/04/12 Posts: 105
Reply with quote #5
Here is the text of the document by Cmd. Walter Fitzpatrick, mentioned in Gen. Jacoby's statement, accusing Obama of treason. It was posted on the site
The JAG Hunter
Tuesday, 17 March 2009
To Mr. Barack Obama
Via: U.S Attorney Russell Dedrick, and Assistant U.S. Attorney Edward Schmutzer, Eastern District, Tennessee
From: Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III, United States Navy Retired
SUBJECT: CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS REGARDING THE COMMISSION OF TREASON
I have observed and extensively recorded invidious attacks by military-political aristocrats against the Constitution for twenty years.
Now you have broken in and entered the White House by force of contrivance, concealment, conceit, dissembling, and deceit. Posing as an impostor president and commander in chief you have stripped civilian command and control over the military establishment. Known military criminal actors—command racketeers—are now free in the exercise of military government intent upon destruction of America’s constitutional government.
Free from constitutional restraint, and following your criminal example, military commanders deployed U.S. Army active duty combat troops into the small civilian community of Samson, Alabama last week in a demonstration of their newly received despotic, domestic police power.
We come now to this reckoning. I accuse you and your military-political criminal assistants of TREASON. I name you and your military criminal associates as traitors. Your criminal ascension manifests a clear and present danger. You fundamentally changed our form of government. The Constitution no longer works.
Confident holding your silent agreement and admission, I identify you as a foreign born domestic enemy.
My sworn duty Mr. Obama is to stand against what you stand for. You are not my president. You are not my commander in chief.
Obedient to the Constitution in submission of this criminal accusation I remain steadfast, and Born fighting,
/s/ (notarized) Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III United States Naval Academy, Class of 1975
Posted this date via priority, certified mail#: 7008 3230 0003 1463 3346
Registered: 03/04/12 Posts: 105
Reply with quote #6
The other individual mentioned in Gen. Jacoby's statement, Col. Lakin , has been well documented
here by The Obamafile.
Additionally, The JAG Hunter provides a sample letter anyone can use to send to a Grand Jury, the FBI, local law enforcement, etc, accusing Obama of treason.
Included on the site are letters that have been submitted with comments by the authors.
Registered: 07/20/11 Posts: 936
Reply with quote #7
Originally Posted by
Beckwith General Charles H. Jacoby, Jr.
I find it hard to believe that the commander of a major command would write such a document. That said, if was indeed written and signed by General Jacoby it's a game changer -- primarily for the general's career. this document
Completely agree! At the top of the document: "De-Classified
USNORTHCOM OBAMA’S MILITARY INDISCRETION De-Classified Att: General Charles H. Jacoby, Jr.,"
What does Att: General Charles H. Jacoby, Jr. mean? I would think that means Attention, am I wrong? Which means someone wrote it TO the General, not the General writing it. Which would make more sense.
Registered: 03/04/12 Posts: 105
Reply with quote #8
Seriously and beckwith, your suspicions may be well founded. As far as I have been able to tell, the Jacoby document was written
to him by Cody Judy in an effort to recruit his support. Judy also submitted the legal brief noted above.
This is my opinion based on reading the other "treason" letters, and the fact those legal briefs are referenced at the end of the Jacoby document.
I also found where (now) Lt. Cmd. Fitzgerald reissued his letter of treason:
Thursday 17 March 2011
From: Walter Francis Fitzpatrick III, United States Navy Retired
To: The Federal Grand Juries sitting in Knoxville, Tennessee
SUBJECT: Renewed formal criminal complaint naming BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and OBAMA’S CRIMINAL ASSISTANTS in commission of the crime of TREASON against the United States of America.
1. We are arrived at a point in our Nation’s life where BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and OBAMA’S CRIMINAL ASSISTANTS threaten the life of our Nation to the point of death. OBAMA and his CRIMINAL COHORTS install an unconstitutional, rival, and competing government that replaces our United States Constitution.
2. Mr. OBAMA’s unconstitutional government is thriving and growing. Under Mr. OBAMA the United States Constitution no longer operates. Mr. OBAMA and his OUTLAW PARTNERS enforce their own form of unconstitutional, treasonous government.
3. Proofs and evidences of OBAMA’s TREASON are manifest. Moreover we have Mr. OBAMA’s two-year silent agreement and consent.
4. Chillingly we find senior military officials, command racketeers, no more obedient to the United States Constitution than Mr. OBAMA. I point to the ATTAINDER courts-martial of Army Colonel, Doctor Terrence Lakin and Sargeant of Marines Lawrence Gordon Hutchins, III. I point to the militarization of domestic emergency services and civilian police forces.
5. Law enforcement officials of every stripe are paralyzed in their unwillingness to do their duty. State and Federal judges accept OBAMA’s TREASON and are derelict in the performance of their duties. (enclosures)
6. I on the other hand refuse to accept the complicity of cowards. I insist and inspire YOU, the Federal Grand Jury, in the exercise of your Great Commission: The Power of Presentment. You are capable of transforming a collective fear and shame darkening this land in to the peaceful exercise of constitutionally recognized law enforcement.
7. Be mindful and clear on this point, this point alone: We the People–in one aspect or another–are the final arbiters in this matter. We the People hold in our hands the final appeal our Declaration of Independence and United States Constitution command.
Here endth the lesson – signed Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III.