Help fight the
liberal media

click title for home page
  
Be a subscriber

────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
The complete history of Barack Obama's second term -- click Views/Repies for top stories
 
 
 


Reply
  Author   Comment   Page 5 of 29     «   Prev   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   Next   »
Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 23,050
Reply with quote  #101 

The delusional melodrama of Jill Stein 

Edward Morrissey (TheWeek) says most people couldn't wait for the grueling, nasty, seemingly interminable 2016 election to end. Jill Stein wants to keep it going. And she's willing to waste a lot of money, time, and attention to do so. Like a bad actor that insists on one last curtain call after the audience has headed for the exits, the Green Party nominee seems to stubbornly believe in her relevance even after the election demonstrated its non-existence beyond any doubt.

Stein's demand for recounts in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania demonstrates arrogance bordering on parody. Stein didn't lose the election so much as she disappeared in it. More than 134 million ballots have been counted so far. Stein received fewer than 1.5 million of them. That's barely a percentage point of the overall popular vote. Libertarian Party nominee Gary Johnson garnered more than 4 million votes, while the two major-party nominees scored between 62 and 65 million votes each.

Legally, any candidate has standing to request a recount -- as long as they pay the costs. Politically and morally, however, Stein utterly lacks any standing to claim she has been harmed by ballot irregularities and counting errors. Proper standing -- at least in political and commonsense contexts -- would go to the person who might have otherwise won an election without such alleged irregularities.

That means the one candidate who might have a decent argument for recounts in places like Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan is Hillary Clinton. (And indeed, Stein's recount demands are surely intended to help Clinton.) So why hasn't the Democrat who sustained a shocking loss in the party's famed "Blue Wall" states pushed for recounts herself? For one thing, Clinton has already conceded the race to Donald Trump, reportedly urged by Barack Obama to do so.

The optics would also be terrible. Clinton spent the last weeks of the election hyperventilating, along with the media, about Trump's refusal to commit to accepting Election Night results. She called it "horrifying" and repeatedly hit Trump's lack of respect for the electoral system. To suddenly demand recounts after those attacks would be a hypocrisy that might be beyond the reach of any politician.

Beyond that, though, there are many thousands of reasons not to demand a recount. Specifically, there are 10,700 reasons in Michigan, 22,000 in Wisconsin, and 68,000 in Pennsylvania. Those are the votes that Clinton would have to make up in a recount to change the outcome in each state, and she'd need to succeed in all three of those states to change the Electoral College outcome. No recount has ever produced a vote change of that magnitude; no recount has even come close to it. FiveThirtyEight's Carl Bialik, working off of data from FairVote, noted that only three of 27 statewide recounts since 2000 have succeeded in changing the outcome of an election -- and only when the original totals were much closer than any of those seen in the 2016 race.

"The mean swing between the top two candidates in the 27 recounts was 282 votes"The mean swing between the top two candidates in the 27 recounts was 282 votes, with a median of 219," Bialik explains. "The biggest swing came in Florida's 2000 presidential election recount, when Al Gore cut 1,247 votes off George W. Bush's lead, ultimately not enough to flip the state to his column."

What about the recounts that have succeeded? Well, I had a ringside seat for one in Minnesota, when Al Franken turned an Election Night defeat into a U.S. Senate seat seven months later. The recount turned into the most bruising, partisan, and contentious political fight the state had ever seen. After several months of recounting, ballot challenges, and numerous court appearances, the change in the gap between Franken and incumbent Norm Coleman was 527 votes -- a miniscule amount of the 2.6 million votes cast. It was just enough to erase Coleman's 215-vote lead after the state-certified canvassing a week after the election and give Franken a 312-vote win in its place.

Stein continues to insist that she wants to pursue the recounts to demand change in voting infrastructure. But her recounts, like those 27 that have preceded them since 2000, would likely make the opposite point -- that our vote-counting infrastructure actually gets accurate and reliable results. Even the Florida debacle in 2000 changed the results by 0.022 percent, just about the same percentage as in 2008's Minnesota recount. It would take 10 times that kind of scale to flip Michigan, and 30 times that scale to flip Wisconsin. Stein's recount demands envision vote swings on a patently ridiculous scale.

Small wonder that even Democrats like Joe Trippi have openly scorned Stein's effort. "It's a waste of time and effort," the Democratic strategist said. "I think it probably was the Stein people looking for a way to stay relevant, raise some money, and take the stink off of them" -- a reference to accusations that Stein played a spoiler role in diverting enough Clinton votes in these states to give Trump the victory. Bob Shrum, another Democratic eminence grise, put it more bluntly -- that there was "no chance" for these recounts to succeed.

Ballot integrity and voting infrastructure aren't the reason for Stein's stunts. Neither is the election outcome. Stein just wants to keep imposing herself on the national stage, eating up time and resources from state governments in order to raise money from suckers unhappy with Trump's victory and feed her own delusions of relevance. Shame on her, and shame on those egging her on.



__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
0
Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 23,050
Reply with quote  #102 

Fox News host slams Jill Stein on recount -- "Is this how you want to be remembered?"

American Lookout is reporting that Fox Business Network host Kennedy asked Jill Stein a very good question yesterday. Is this really how Stein wants to be remembered? No one is going to remember her 2016 campaign. They're going to remember her pointless effort to throw shade on the integrity of the vote.

Mediaite reports:

Kennedy Faces Off with Jill Stein on Recounts

On Fox Business Network tonight, Kennedy faced off with Jill Stein about her push for recounts in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. Stein said, "This is not a partisan action here. This is on behalf of very frustrated, cynical, disappointed voters."

She pointed to how there was hacking earlier on in the election, but Kennedy said there's no evidence to indicate any voting systems were hacked. She pressed Stein on why she's only focusing on these three states in particular, taking note of how those are all states won by Donald Trump…

Kennedy offered Stein some words of praise, calling her a "woman of great integrity," before asking her, "Is this how you want to be remembered?" Stein said she's been consistent throughout the election on favoring challenges in states where there's "doubt."

Here's the video:

It's hilarious to watch Stein try to spin this situation into some kind of positive action.

Nothing she's doing is bringing anyone together.

This woman is a ditz -- and she clearly doesn't know what she's talking about when it comes to computer systems and hacking.

Meanwhile, the scam rolls on:

pic523.jpg


__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
0
lawyer12

Registered:
Posts: 884
Reply with quote  #103 
The self-implosion of the Democrat Party could not happen to a more worthy party in my opinion.  To think a black overseer (aka Muslim Usurper) is the one who hastened the demise since 2008.  God Bless us all.  To all the blacks lynched, murdered and enslaved along with whites who supported the Republican party, we don't know how to thank this demise.

I just hope Trump can put a death kill of the Democrat Party with prosecution of Treason, Murder, etc...  with his Attorney General Sessions starting in 2017.  Then we really can rejoice.
0
Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 23,050
Reply with quote  #104 

Who is behind Jill Stein's recount in three blue states?

S. Noble (IndependentSentinel) is reporting that Michigan has certified the state's election results declaring Trump the winner which sets up a Wednesday deadline for Green Party presidential nominee Jill Stein to request a recount there. Michigan automatically counts the votes twice and Stein is seeking a third recount.

Today Stein also filed for an election recount in the State of Pennsylvania and the Wisconsin Election Commission announced today a recount of that state's presidential results could happen as early as next week but it will cost $3.5 million and Stein has roc one up with the money by Tuesday. Stein's effort now joined by the Clinton camp sparked a weekend Twitter storm from President-elect Trump who called the recount bid a "scam."

No one would give Jill Stein millions of dollars if it wasn't for some higher purpose. She came in fourth with under 1% of the vote and yet she is challenging the results. Obviously she is doing it for the Hillary campaign. No one believes Hillary joined Stein but most believe Stein was Hillary's lackey or George Soros's.

Jill Stein's running mate, Ajamu Baraka, has worked for at least one organisation funded by Soros -- the Center for Constitutional Rights which has taken almost half a million from the Open Society Foundation. She can't be trusted.

We recently reported that NY Magazine's Gabriel Sherman wrote about a "team" of so-called experts who were pushing for a recount of three blue states, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, that went for Donald Trump even though they found no evidence of hacking. They said there was some irregularity in the pattern of voting but offered no evidence of anything untoward.

The team included lawyer John Bonifaz, Co-Founder and President of "Free Speech for People." His board of Directors includes Lance Lindblom, former Executive Vice President at Soros' Foundation's Open Society Institute/Open Society Fund.

This recount is likely not only funded by George Soros' money, it is also manned by some of Soros' closest advisors. Foreign intervention in a US election is not coming from Russia, but from George Soros' Global Shadow Government.

Mr. Bonifaz previously served as the Executive Director and then General Counsel of the National Voting Rights Institute, an organization he founded in 1994, and as the Legal Director of Voter Action, a national election integrity organization. Mr. Bonifaz has been at the forefront of key voting rights battles in the country for more than two decades.

George Soros is behind major voting rights lawsuits in this country.

It's all very suspicious.

Brad Blakeman told Steve Doucy on Fox & Friends today that, "This is Hillary-driven. Jill Stein is just a pawn in Hillary's game to delegitimize Donald Trump's victory and to raise money. It's the biggest scam that we've ever seen in politics."

He added that, "The bottom line is we know the Russians did not fix the election. Richard knows that. The American people know that. Donald Trump won. He won fair and square. Yet, Democrats, because he did not win the popular vote, seek to delegitimize him as the president. I think it's awful for their party. They should move on. They have infighting in the leadership this week in the house. They have infighting going on as to who will be the next leader of the Democratic Party. They have bigger fish to fry than this. And it's demeaning for their party."

That just about covers it.

Get lost Hillary!


__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
0
Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 23,050
Reply with quote  #105 

NFL Hall of Famer Jim Brown on Trump -- "I'm pulling" for Trump, he is going to be for all the people"

pic494.jpg

Onan Coca (Constitution.com) is reporting that NFL Hall of Famer Jim Brown isn't just one of the greatest running backs and football players of all time, he was also a very important figure in the Civil Right's movement.

He marched with some of the most heroic figures of the mid-twentieth century and he pled with a nation of football fans to not only support him on the field but to support African-Americans in our culture. Brown often "put his money where his mouth was" and risked his career, his financial future, and his comfort to do fight for the cause of equality, and that history likely led to the question he was recently asked on ESPN's Sportscenter. Brown was on ESPN earlier this week when he was asked for his thoughts on the recent election, and the fact that Donald Trump was now our president-elect when he surprised more than a few people by expressing his support and great hope for Donald Trump's presidency.

I think that things are being shaken up. I think that people are being provoked to come out with their real feelings. I think that it looks negative a great degree, but I think that any time you put a person in a position of responsibility that their good side can come out. So, Donald is going to either be a great leader and shake things up the right way, or he's going to shake things up the wrong way and that's going to make the great people come out and resist it.

So, it's just not going to be neutral. It's not going to lay dead. It's going to be very provocative and I'm hoping it will be provocative in a very positive way. So, I'm pulling for the president. He is the president, and I know that he is going to be for all the people and I hope that that bravado that he presents becomes a positive energy so that we could all get behind doing the right thing.

If only everyone could have the same spirit and reaction to Mr. Trump's soon-to-be presidency, our nation would be far better off for it. While many Republicans were terrified of what an Obama presidency could bring (and eventually did bring), many of those same people at least voiced their support for his presidency and hoped that he would be successful. Sadly, many of our worst fears about Obama were eventually realized… but still we did not riot, we did not throw tantrums and threaten our neighbors. No, instead we marched peacefully, organized rallies, and led the GOP to stunning electoral victories in both state and national legislatures.

If only the Democrats could react in a similarly adult manner.



__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
0
Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 23,050
Reply with quote  #106 

Hillary's hypocrisy -- then, "we must accept this result" -- now, "we are taking part in the vote recount"

pic493.jpg

Howard Portnoy (Constitution.com) says: and here you thought Hillary Clinton really meant it when she announced that she was accepting the results of the election, telling a crowd of disappointed supporters on Nov. 9, "Donald Trump is going to be our president. We owe him an open mind and a chance to lead."

The truth has eluded Clinton as long as she has been a public figure, so it should surprise no one that she has changed her mind. From CNN:

Hillary Clinton's campaign said Saturday it will take part in efforts to push for recounts in several key states, joining with Green Party candidate Jill Stein, who has raised millions of dollars to have votes counted again in Wisconsin.

But, in a post on Medium, Marc Elias, the campaign's counsel, said the campaign's own investigation has not uncovered any evidence of hacking of voting systems.

In the campaign's most detailed comments to date on the recount, Elias wrote that while the campaign was not going to contest the results itself, it has decided now to take part in the effort to "ensure that it is fair to all sides."

You can try parsing that statement six ways from Sunday, but you will never find an interpretation that makes sense…



__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
0
Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 23,050
Reply with quote  #107 

The Democrats’ real strategy in launching recounts

pic491.jpg

Richard Baehr (AmericanThinker) says the recount in Wisconsin, and the coming ones in Michigan and Pennsylvania will not change the outcomes in any of the states.  No recount ever changes thousands of votes.  

Just for the record, Donald Trump won Pennsylvania by 70k, Wisconsin by 27k and Michigan by 10k votes.

I do not think that changing the outcome of the election is the purpose of the recount.

The recounts, if done by hand, which can be demanded, may take longer than the last day for completing the official counts in a state and directing Electoral College voters.  If all 3 states miss the deadline, Trump is at 260, Hillary at 232.  No one hits 270.

Then this goes to Congress, where the House voting 1 vote per state elects Trump, and Senate selects Pence. This would be first time Pthis happened since 1824, but in that case, John Quincy Adams won in the House, though he had fewer electoral college votes than Andrew Jackson.

If this goes to the US House and Senate, and the result is the same as result from the Electoral College without the recounts, why do it?  The answer is to make Trump seem even more illegitimate, that he did not win the popular vote  (he lost by over 2.1 million), he did not win the Electoral College (did not reach 270), and was elected by being inserted into the presidency by members of his own party in Congress.

The recount in Wisconsin, and the coming ones in Michigan and Pennsylvania will not change the outcomes in any of the states.  No recount ever changes thousands of votes.  I do not think that is the purpose.

The recounts, if done by hand, which can be demanded, may take longer than the last day for completing the official counts in a state and directing Electoral College voters.  If all 3 states miss the deadline, Trump is at 260, Hillary at 232.  No one hits 270.

Then this goes to Congress, where the House voting 1 vote per state elects Trump, and Senate selects Pence. This would be first time Pthis happened since 1824, but in that case, John Quincy Adams won in the House, though he had fewer electoral college votes than Andrew Jackson.

If this goes to the US House and Senate, and the result is the same as result from the Electoral College without the recounts, why do it?

The answer is to make Trump seem even more illegitimate. That he did not win the popular vote  (he lost by over 2.1 million). He did not win the Electoral College (did not reach 270).

The Democrats will claim Trump was elected by being inserted into the presidency by members of his own party in Congress.

Steve Moore says if the Democrats try to change the results of the election. there would be a Civil War.

Interesting, but at some point, the recount numbers will be reported and trump will have been shown to have won the electoral college vote.

But this guy's theory does illustrate how devious the Left is.


__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
0
Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 23,050
Reply with quote  #108 

Jill Stein's comment on the death of Castro tells you why she's raising recount

pic485.jpg

Zip says this is unbelievable -- that this should come from anyone running for the highest office in the land.

But Jill Stein is as far left as they come, and as with all on the far left, it's about bringing chaos and question against the United States. In this case, pushing the recount is not because there is any chance of success, but because it helps to raise a question about the validity of elections.



__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
0
Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 23,050
Reply with quote  #109 

The Donald J. Trump Transition Team statement on the recount efforts

pic484.jpg

From the Trump Transition Team:

"The people have spoken and the election is over, and as Hillary Clinton herself said on election night, in addition to her conceding by congratulating me, ‘We must accept this result and then look to the future.'
 
"It is important to point out that with the help of millions of voters across the country, we won 306 electoral votes on Election Day -- the most of any Republican since 1988 -- and we carried nine of 13 battleground states, 30 of 50 states, and more than 2,600 counties nationwide -- the most since President Ronald Reagan in 1984.

"This recount is just a way for Jill Stein, who received less than one percent of the vote overall and wasn't even on the ballot in many states, to fill her coffers with money, most of which she will never even spend on this ridiculous recount. All three states were won by large numbers of voters, especially Pennsylvania, which was won by more than 70,000 votes. 

"This is a scam by the Green Party for an election that has already been conceded, and the results of this election should be respected instead of being challenged and abused, which is exactly what Jill Stein is doing."

Considering the fact that Stein doesn't want Hillary to join in the recount effort, it certainly seems that Stein's motives are something other than "finding the truth."

Millions of dollars is a mighty motivator.



__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
0
Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 23,050
Reply with quote  #110 

Jill Stein slams Hillary for joining her recount

pic479.jpg

Tom Franklin (AmericanLookout) is reporting that Jill Stein's recount is slipping into the bizarre.

It's Liberals' last chance to overthrow Trump's historic win. So all the crazies are joining forces.

One problem: The crazy Liberals don't seem to like each other.

Jill Stein doesn't want Hillary's help and took to Twitter and put out these tweets:

pic480.jpg

Ouch! No love lost between Jill Stein and Hillary!

And just for good measure, Jill Stein threw out some Communist language. Just so everyone would remember she's still a Communist, maybe?

pic481.jpg

Yikes!

Liberals have some serious problems if they're counting on Jill Stein and Hillary to work together on a recount.

You can't make this stuff up!


__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
0
Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 23,050
Reply with quote  #111 

Hillary Clinton has been scheming since the day after the election to steal the presidency

pic483.jpg

Kristinn Taylor (GatewayPundit) says Democratic Party presidential nominee Hillary Clinton may have publicly conceded the presidency to Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump the morning after the November 8 election but behind the scenes she was scheming with an army of operatives to find ways to steal the presidency from Trump.

In public Clinton acted out the part of the gracious, retiring loser -- being seen in photos running into supporters as she roamed around her hometown of Chappaqua, New York. But the ‘accepting Hillary' image was a front that hid the true Hillary who was furiously seeking a way to claw back Trump's election for herself.

Clinton campaign lawyer Marc E. Elias gave the scheme away in an article published Saturday morning at Medium announcing Clinton would join the recount effort in Wisconsin by Green Party presidential nominee Jill Stein and that Clinton would join Stein should she also file for recounts in Michigan and Pennsylvania.

Elias wrote that starting the day after the election the Clinton campaign worked to find ways to reverse Trump's election.

Those efforts continue through the present, Elias wrote, and now include joining the recount efforts by Stein.

Elias' statement about Clinton's behind the scenes scheming excerpted from Medium:

…we have quietly taken a number of steps in the last two weeks to rule in or out any possibility of outside interference in the vote tally in these critical battleground states.

First, since the day after the election we have had lawyers and data scientists and analysts combing over the results to spot anomalies that would suggest a hacked result. These have included analysts both from within the campaign and outside, with backgrounds in politics, technology and academia.

Second, we have had numerous meetings and calls with various outside experts to hear their concerns and to discuss and review their data and findings. As a part of this, we have also shared out data and findings with them. Most of those discussions have remained private, while at least one has unfortunately been the subject of leaks.

Third, we have attempted to systematically catalogue and investigate every theory that has been presented to us within our ability to do so.

Fourth, we have examined the laws and practices as they pertain to recounts, contests and audits.

Fifth, and most importantly, we have monitored and staffed the post-election canvasses  --  where voting machine tapes are compared to poll-books, provisional ballots are resolved, and all of the math is double checked from election night. During that process, we have seen Secretary Clinton's vote total grow, so that, today, her national popular vote lead now exceeds more than 2 million votes.

In the coming days, we will continue to perform our due diligence and actively follow all further activities that are to occur prior to the certification of any election results…"

Elias admits the campaign could find no evidence to support a challenge to Trump's victory, but that is not stopping them from joining Stein in trying to overthrow Trump's presidency before it begins.

"Because we had not uncovered any actionable evidence of hacking or outside attempts to alter the voting technology, we had not planned to exercise this option ourselves, but now that a recount has been initiated in Wisconsin, we intend to participate in order to ensure the process proceeds in a manner that is fair to all sides."

Meanwhile, Best Actress for faking acceptance of the results of a fair presidential election goes to…

pic482.jpg



__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
0
Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 23,050
Reply with quote  #112 

Jill Stein slams Hillary for joining her recount

pic479.jpg

Tom Franklin (AmericanLookout) is reporting that Jill Stein's recount is slipping into the bizarre.

It's Liberals' last chance to overthrow Trump's historic win. So all the crazies are joining forces.

One problem: The crazy Liberals don't seem to like each other.

Jill Stein doesn't want Hillary's help and took to Twitter and put out these tweets:

pic480.jpg

Ouch! No love lost between Jill Stein and Hillary!

And just for good measure, Jill Stein threw out some Communist language. Just so everyone would remember she's still a Communist, maybe?

pic481.jpg

Yikes!

Liberals have some serious problems if they're counting on Jill Stein and Hillary to work together on a recount.

You can't make this stuff up!



__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
0
Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 23,050
Reply with quote  #113 

A Trump strategy to stop the Clinton's from stealing the election

pic478.jpg

Jim Hoft (GatewayPundit) says below is a list of potential actions the Trump Team should consider in response to the requested and pending state recounts that would allow Hillary Clinton to steal the 2016 election.

Learn from the past

In 2000 Democrat Al Gore tried to steal the election in Florida from Republican GW Bush. Just before the deadline for recount requests, the Gore team petitioned for recounts in just four Florida counties that happened to be heavily Democrat voting counties.  If Gore wanted a fair recount he would have selected the entire state.  By selecting the heavy Democrat counties Gore was hoping to pick up enough uncounted Democrat votes and steal the election.  There was no time for Bush to ask for recounts in all Florida counties when Gore made his recount motion.  Bush was leading Gore by 1,700 votes.

After two recounts Bush was still winning. At this point Gore asked for another recount.  Gore's team knew that if Florida did not have a definitive winner by the deadline to file with the federal government, which likely would happen with another time consuming recount that the Florida votes would not be counted and Gore would win the national election based on his lead in Electoral College votes.  The Bush team countered the 3rd Gore recount request and it went to the Florida Supreme Court which was Democrat and they agreed with Gore's request.  Next the Bush team went to the US Supreme Court which sided with Bush and the recounts were stopped and Bush won the election and became President.

Don't underestimate the corrupt Clinton Machine

The Gore and Bush teams sent armies to Florida in 2000. It still took the US Supreme Court to step in and stop the Gore camp from stealing the election.  This is a big deal.  The Clintons have been working on this since election night.

Don't count on a fair US Supreme Court

Currently the balance in the Supreme Court is not in Trump's favor. The Liberal judges will give the steal to Hillary.  Trump must win this battle outright.

Consider recounts in states that Hillary won and act quickly

Trump won Pennsylvania by 70k, Wisconsin by 27k and Michigan by 10k.  Hillary won New Hampshire by less than 3k, Maine (3 of 4) by less than 20k, Nevada by 27k, and Minnesota 45k.  If Hillary were to steal Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan she would be ahead in the Electoral College voting 278 to 260 and therefore Trump would have to gain 9 Electoral College votes from Clinton to counter her recount steal.  Winning New Hampshire (4) and Nevada (6) would give Trump the recount steal block.

Solicit for money and volunteers

Michigan Republicans have solicited for both money and people to help with possible recounts there.  Wisconsin and Pennsylvania must get on the ball.  This could be a good thing for their coffers if they are smart.  If they allow the Clinton steal due to their ineptitude it will never be forgotten.  Thousands of good volunteers will also been needed.

The Wisconsin GOP @WisGOP is Not asking for donations or assistance for Recall… That's pretty shocking!

-- Jim Hoft (@gatewaypundit) November 27, 2016

Risk rate areas of concern and focus resources there

Democrats do not play fair so you must determine if you want to pick up Republican votes or diminish Democrat votes or both. Use data analytics to determine which locations to focus on.  Obtain recent death lists and run this against Democrat voter lists.  If able to determine US citizenship, challenge all Democrat votes where citizenship was not verified.  If able to determine past felony records run this against the Democrat voter records.  If able to determine residency run this against Democrat voter records.  Review everything and focus on high risk areas.

Train volunteers

Teach volunteers what to look for. Split up volunteers and ask for more than two Republicans at each recount desk at each recount site.  Ask them to challenge every Democrat vote.  Be alert for big changes.  Keep an eye on your surroundings and demand dual controls on everything (make sure at least two people perform every task).

Auditing 101 – Trust Your Gut

If something looks fishy it probably is. With the Clintons everything if fishy, crooked and corrupt.  Trust your instincts and challenge everything because the Clintons are in for the steal and have been working on this for longer than anyone knows.

Jill Stein is just a decoy and is gaining something for her efforts.

The Clintons are behind this and would not be doing this if they didn't think they could make the steal.

Personally, I'd just phone Hillary Clinton and let her know, that if she fails, I was coming after her with the full force and weight of the federal government and she would end up in the deepest and darkest hole in Leavenworth.



__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
0
Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 23,050
Reply with quote  #114 

Oops. Jill Stein cannot file a direct request for a recount in Pennsylvania

pic475.jpg

Jim Host (GatewayPundit) is reporting that Stein would have to present a case showing voter fraud took place.

Trump won Pennsylvania by 70 thousand votes.

Stein would have to prove that fraud was "probable." That does not seem likely. Then again, we are talking about the Clintons here.

The Inquisitr reported, via Free Republic:

Per Pennsylvania regulations, there is only one way remaining for Jill Stein to get a recount in Pennsylvania and it is a complicated process. BillyPenn reports that Stein would have to file for a court appeal and present a "prima facie case" showing that voter fraud took place. While prima facie has a lower burden of proof threshold than "beyond reasonable doubt," it is still significant. Stein would have to prove in court that fraud was "probable." This is going to be very difficult given that even the computer specialists recommending the recount say there is no proof of hacking or fraud.

In fact, the Medium reports that Clinton's own legal team headed by Marc Elias has noted that Clinton's team "had not uncovered any actionable evidence of hacking or outside attempts to alter the voting technology." The Obama administration echoed that by stating that the government did not observe any increased level of malicious cyber-activity aimed at disrupting our electoral process on election day. According to Newsmax, Obama is standing behind the results which indicate that Trump won the election, saying the election was "free and fair from a cybersecurity perspective."

Elias also noted that in even the closest margin state, Michigan, Trump's win "well exceeds the largest margin ever overcome in a recount." Therefore, Elias says that is why Clinton herself did not pursue a recount effort. However, since Stein has funded and initiated the effort, Elias says that Clinton will participate to ensure fairness.

More… Via Reddit and Michael Tracy:

pic476.jpg

Stein has to prove that fraud took place:

pic477.jpg


__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
0
Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 23,050
Reply with quote  #115 

Just like the Terminator -- Hillary refuses to die

pic473.jpg

My, how things change!

pic474.jpg

But Hillary is right about one thing -- she's a direct threat to our republic.



__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
0
lawyer12

Registered:
Posts: 884
Reply with quote  #116 
Pray, Read your Bible and start packing.  We the People need to show that with Obama's presidency and the huge surge in gun purchases for the past 8 years, WE MEAN BUSINESS.

Take your Venezuela, France, Belgium form of Socialist Utopia and shove it up your liberal a**.
0
Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 23,050
Reply with quote  #117 

The Globalists will do anything to stop Trump

pic468.jpg

Ray Starmann (USDefenseWatch) says those arch enemies of Americanism -- of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, the globalists, are in a panic state.

Those arch enemies of the middle class and prosperity, those diabolical enemies of God who make Machiavelli look like an altar boy are at it again.

Like evil elves working non-stop in Lucifer's Village, the globalists are plotting ten thousand and one ways to stop President-elect Trump from ever serving a day in office.

Their ruthlessness and treason knows no bounds.

As the final vote tallies came in on the night of November 8th and Trump won the election, as Hillary went into a boxed wine induced rage and took a swing at Podesta; the globalist phone networks across the world began to light up. Everything had failed to stop Trump. But, it wasn't over yet.

The elite contacted their chief financial officer of mayhem, the Goldfinger of the Globalists, George Soros.

Soros began to write checks. He pumped money into Black Lives Matter and other nationwide anarchist groups; professional protesters, who, when not bagging groceries at the co-op, or swigging a bottle of Jack Daniels in front of a McDonald's are more than happy to turn a police car into a Duraflame log.

The protests began. They were packed with the usual array of naïve leftists: public school teachers, freeze dried hippie Jerry Rubin wannabes and the left's newest weapon of terror, the special snowflake.

Within 24 hours, the marches began, the crying commenced and the #NotMyPresident hash tags wafted through social media like a dense mustard gas at the Somme.

As extreme close up shots of teary eyed liberals filled CNN's screens, the left wing pundits all speculated how the impossible could have happened and how Trump must be toppled before he ever parks his keister in the Oval Office.

But, the protests began to lose steam. The rioters ran out of Molotov Cocktails and the Millennials pooped out and returned to their safe spaces, juice and Play Doh.

Plan Bravo went into action.

Instantly, the mainstream media was all too happy to inform us 1000 times a day that Hillary had won the popular vote. Since Trump had won the election by winning the electoral vote, 240 years of the American electoral college process was now obsolete and needed to be changed, and as quickly as possible, to allow Brunhilda to ascend to the thrown on Pennsylvania Avenue.

The Democrats paraded Nancy Pelosi, Bernie Sanders, Charlie Rangel and Barbara Boxer out on stage. A so called Boxer Bill would be rushed through Congress. Sure, it was unfair that California and New York would decide the Presidency, but what is illegal immigration for, if not for stacking the Democratic Party with unskilled laborers who want free benefits from the guv mint.

With a little help from Congress, the genius of the Founding Fathers would be jettisoned like an empty fuel pod and the good old USA would be just as screwed up as those solid bastions of European democracy like Italy and the Ukraine.

But, that ran out of gas too.

On to Plan Charlie…

The globalists' and their willing lackeys in corruption, the Democrats next move is the recount.

Jill Stein, an apparent nemesis of Hellary, who once claimed Mrs. Clinton would ignite a nuclear war, seems all too excited to file requests for recounts in Blue Wall states Trump won.

Stein is motivated by the limelight she now has and never had before and the millions of dollars flowing in from globalist donors. No doubt a six or seven figure check has been handed to Stein as well.

Strangely, the Democrats are remaining silent on recounts in the Blue states that Hillary won. Are they afraid that a recount might show how much Hillary cheated in states like Virginia, Minnesota, New Mexico and Colorado?

When the recount efforts blow up in their faces, the globalists will be pushed further into a very small corner.

Their next move probably includes pushing the fragile, wounded world financial markets over a very steep cliff. A market meltdown could take place before Obama leaves office. Perhaps, the situation would be so chaotic that the inauguration would be delayed or cancelled until the situation was stabilized.

These are desperate, ruthless people. The globalists know their days of corruption, cheap labor, market manipulation, jimmy-rigging trade deals, endless, unwinnable wars and the fleecing of the average American are coming to an abrupt end on January 20th.

They will do everything they can to stop Trump from taking the oath of office. If those measures fail, they will stop at nothing to end his Presidency any way they can.

As always, pray for Trump as he makes America great again.



__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
0
Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 23,050
Reply with quote  #118 

Trump officially declared final winner in Michigan, by 10,704 votes

pic446.jpg

The Detroit Free Press is reporting that in the closest race for president in Michigan's history, Republican Donald Trump is hanging on to a 10,704 vote win over Democrat Hillary Clinton.

The Michigan Secretary of State posted results Wednesday that were submitted by the state's 83 county clerks on Tuesday after the votes were reviewed and certified by each county.

Before that compiled count, Trump held a 13,107 lead over Clinton. But after each county certified its results, the lead shrunk to 10,704, with the biggest chunk coming from Wayne County, which showed that Clinton had gotten 565 more votes than originally tallied by the county.

The state's Board of Canvassers will officially certify the results on Nov. 28. The electoral college in all the states, including Michigan's 16 electors, will cast their votes on Dec. 19.



__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
0
Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 23,050
Reply with quote  #119 

Trump sets new record for votes received by a Republican presidential candidate

pic433.jpg

The Washington Examiner is reporting that by carrying the long-Democratic states of Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, President-elect Trump won a resounding electoral college victory. But he also lost the popular vote -- a legally meaningless fact that should concern Republicans about the future all the same.

However, there is one milestone that Trump has now managed to cross as votes continue to be counted.

Twelve years after George W. Bush set a record for the number of votes won by a Republican presidential candidate, Trump has just barely inched past him. Bush’s total, just over 62 million, was good enough at that time for an overall majority of the popular vote.



__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
0
Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 23,050
Reply with quote  #120 
Here it comes -- Clinton campaign considers challenging Trump's victory

pic430.jpg

Kristinn Taylor (GatewayPundit) is reporting that prominent computer scientists from leading universities are urging the Clinton campaign to challenge the election results in three states.

The Clinton campaign participated in a conference call with the investigators in interest of challenging the election 2016 results.

Donald Trump won the election with 306 electoral votes.

trump-map-30-states

The far left computer scientists have no proof the election results were tampered with but are speculating the results in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania may have been manipulated.

Gabriel Sherman at New York Magazine reported:

Hillary Clinton is being urged by a group of prominent computer scientists and election lawyers to call for a recount in three swing states won by Donald Trump, New York has learned. The group, which includes voting-rights attorney John Bonifaz and J. Alex Halderman, the director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society, believes they've found persuasive evidence that results in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania may have been manipulated or hacked. The group is so far not speaking on the record about their findings and is focused on lobbying the Clinton team in private.

Last Thursday, the activists held a conference call with Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta and campaign general counsel Marc Elias to make their case, according to a source briefed on the call. The academics presented findings showing that in Wisconsin, Clinton received 7 percent fewer votes in counties that relied on electronic-voting machines compared with counties that used optical scanners and paper ballots. Based on this statistical analysis, Clinton may have been denied as many as 30,000 votes; she lost Wisconsin by 27,000. While it's important to note the group has not found proof of hacking or manipulation, they are arguing to the campaign that the suspicious pattern merits an independent review -- especially in light of the fact that the Obama White House has accused the Russian government of hacking the Democratic National Committee.

According to current tallies, Trump has won 290 Electoral College votes to Clinton's 232, with Michigan's 16 votes not apportioned because the race there is still too close to call. It would take overturning the results in both Wisconsin (10 Electoral College votes) and Pennsylvania (20 votes), in addition to winning Michigan's 16, for Clinton to win the Electoral College. There is also the complicating factor of "faithless electors," or members of the Electoral College who do not vote according to the popular vote in their states. At least six electoral voters have said they would not vote for Trump, despite the fact that he won their states.

The Clinton camp is running out of time to challenge the election…

Hillary would have to pick up 38 electoral votes to win the election.

Keep the dream alive, Hillary supporters!


__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
0
Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 23,050
Reply with quote  #121 

Dear Liberals

pic391.jpg

I know these are some tough times for you. Your visions of a Euro-style utopia where citizens live in hamster sized apartments and address each other in a gender neutral speak have been blown to smithereens by the Man from Manhattan.

What a shame, we aren't going to descend into darkness with the pants suit clad criminal goblin leading us into Hades. There's actually hope and prosperity and freedom on the horizon and you can't handle it.

There aren't really enough words to describe your actions lately: cry babies, brats, spoiled whiners, ninnies, aggrieved marshmallows, rude, obnoxious, violent, destructive…The list is endless like a series of Fibonacci numbers.

It's more than obvious that you little organic, gluten free liberals are in the midst of one really serious meltdown.

Your liberal obnoxiousness reached a new low last night. According to the NY Post:

Vice President-elect Mike Pence was booed Friday night at a performance of the Broadway hit "Hamilton."

Pence was walking to his seat at the Richard Rodgers Theatre when a few scattered claps turned into a thundering chorus of boos.

The crowd continued to mock Pence throughout the performance, including during the song "Yorktown," when Alexander Hamilton and Marquis de Lafayette sang "Immigrants, we get the job done." They high-fived each other as the audience cheered.

Brandon Dixon, who plays Aaron Burr, addressed Pence after the curtain call, saying the diverse cast is "anxious" about his administration.

You claim to be so tolerant, but the truth is you are the most intolerant SOB's on the planet aren't you?

Under the guise of peace and granola, you rant and rave and won't hesitate to verbally assault anyone from the right who won't march in lockstep to your mantra.

You love to label the right as prone to violence, when you have no problem committing violence on a daily basis to enforce your twisted ideals on everyone else.

Donald Trump has been elected president. This will be confirmed by the Electoral College you now want to do away with on December 19th.

And, there's nothing you can do about it. Let that sink in to your brainwashed craniums for a moment.

In actuality, what you ranting hyenas don't understand is that Trump is more than anything else about economic prosperity for everyone. Trump is not Mr. Potter from It's a Wonderful Life. He doesn't want to sit in his mansion and watch people suffer, while he rakes in interest payments. He's George Bailey with deep, deep pockets. America is Bedford Falls to Trump. He wants to ensure that all of its citizens have a decent job and a home and that the streets are filled with law and order.

And, you can't get it, for the simple reason that the American Dream is your worst nightmare.

You despise family, freedom, prosperity and God. Nearly everything you stand for is the antithesis of the family, freedom, prosperity and God. Nearly everything you stand for was designed by social engineers and Marxists to destroy the family, freedom, prosperity and God.

Economic Prosperity is not racism.

Law and order is not sexism.

Securing the border is not xenophobia.

Destroying ISIS is not fascism.

Americanism is not Islamophobia.

Let me explain it to you as simply as possible liberals. Trump won because America has had enough of you and your authoritarian, anti-American, socialist, feminist, European crap.

Your liberal utopia is nothing more than some twisted version of 1984, where Big Brother controls every facet of one's life.

And, that dog just don't hunt.

Americans are up to their necks in absurd political correctness, gender neutral insanity and the feminization of our young men into quivering pieces of Jell-o in capris.

Americans are sick and tired of watching illegals take our jobs and drive down wages.

Americans have had enough of our companies being outsourced to Third World countries.

Americans aren't going to allow leftist fools to Merkelize the nation with millions of undocumented Muslims, whose first thought upon seeing the Statue of Liberty, is how many pounds of Semtex will it take to destroy it.

Americans aren't going to watch the Second Amendment be destroyed by radical judges who learned their trades at Berkeley.

Americans know our military has been severely weakened and feminized by leftist social engineers who don't know a M-1 from a SU-27.

Americans want their schools back from the paralyzing tentacles of Common Core and the Department of Education octopus.

The truth is, you're all about control and you've lost it. And, you can't handle that simple fact. You can't handle the fact that the people you despise, those bitter clingers just took away your power to destroy in one fell swoop.

Not only do you not have the power to turn America into Sweden on steroids, but you also have to face the fact that Americans rejected you and rejected you en masse.

Breathe deep liberals and try to relax. Pretend you're in a yoga class. After you've taken some deep breaths, go and buy a copy of the Constitution. You may actually learn something.

Get used to saying President Trump, for the next EIGHT years.

Ray Starmann


__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
0
Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 23,050
Reply with quote  #122 

Here’s what happened to diversity in Congress the night Trump won

The Conservative tribune is reporting that the same allegedly racist Americans who voted allegedly racist Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump into office last week also just happened to vote into office the most racially diverse Congress in U.S. history.

"Record numbers of Hispanics, African-Americans, Asian-Americans and women of color will serve in the next legislative session," reported The Hill.

Specifically, the new Congress was slated to feature 38 Hispanics, 49 African-Americans and 15 Asian-Americans. The number of women of color will quadruple, and the Senate will have its largest-ever number of female members, at 21. President-elect Trump's victory hasn't had the results the left predicted.

The point was that this idea of liberals that Trump had won because of widespread racism in America was just plain false.

minorities-in-congress

If America were even an iota as racist as liberals have alleged, then the next Congress would not be so diverse. The American people were not racists, and neither was Donald Trump. In reality, the only ones perpetuating racism (among other hateful beliefs) were liberal Democrats, who felt it necessary to pigeonhole everyone.

Americans were also not homophobic or sexist, let alone bigoted against non-Christian religions, which was evident by the fact that the new Congress was to feature 7 homosexuals, 104 women and 39 non-Christians.

The truth is that far too many liberals do not see and have never seen people as individuals, but rather as tools useful for political purposes. It is this same backward mentality that has often spurred Democrats into attacking minorities who refuse to toe their political line.

But here is an even more pertinent truth: This revelation regarding the most racially diverse Congress should not even matter, as the quality of a Congress should be judged by its members' individual talents and abilities, not their skin color, gender, religion or sexual orientation.


__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
0
Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 23,050
Reply with quote  #123 

Inside the Trump International Hotel (DC) when Donald Trump won


__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
0
Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 23,050
Reply with quote  #124 

Who's laughing now?

Despite the media laughing in his face for the past year, Donald Trump won the 2016 election.

TV’s finest have spent the past two and a half days walking back months of Trump ridicule, but like elephants, the Internet video wizards don’t forget.

Let's review a few of their greatest hits:


__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
0
lawyer12

Registered:
Posts: 884
Reply with quote  #125 
We are Americans... President-Elect Trump keep your Promise for America...

Make America Great Again for all people

United We Stand, Divided We Fall.





0
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Print
Reply

Easily create a Forum Website with Website Toolbox.

Help fight the
ObamaMedia

The United States Library of Congress
has selected TheObamaFile.com for inclusion
in its historic collection of Internet materials

Be a subscriber

© Copyright  Beckwith  2011 - 2017
All rights reserved