Help us fight the
ObamaMedia

click title for home page
  
Be a subscribing
member

────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
The stuff you won't see in the liberal media
Register Calendar Chat
 
 
 


Reply
  Author   Comment   Page 2 of 20      Prev   1   2   3   4   5   Next   »
pinebark

Registered:
Posts: 80
Reply with quote  #26 
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/01/30/sheriff-arpaios-phoenix-offices-temporarily-evacuated/#comment

FOX ripped this article down pronto.
McG

Registered:
Posts: 31
Reply with quote  #27 

Maybe somewhat off-topic, but not too far off I hope ...

 

Does anyone know when Sheriff Arpaio is releasing the report on Obama?  I've heard/read February a few times, but nothing more specific.

Seriously

Avatar / Picture

Registered:
Posts: 1,060
Reply with quote  #28 
I've heard mid-Feb but no specific date.

__________________
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." Thomas Jefferson
McG

Registered:
Posts: 31
Reply with quote  #29 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seriously
I've heard mid-Feb but no specific date.

 

Thanks!  Like everyone else I'm curious as hell to find out what Sheriff Joe and his Posse dug up on our Dear Leader.

Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 24,815
Reply with quote  #30 

March 1st

 

My understanding is that Apraio will release the results of his Cold Case Posse investigation during a news conference on March 1, 2012.

 


__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 24,815
Reply with quote  #31 

100,000 line up to back Sheriff Joe
 

Jerome Corsi is reporting that officials with Grassfire Nation, a key coordinating group for TEA-Party-type activities and issues, say the Department of Justice’s investigation of Maricopa, Ariz., County Sheriff Joe Arpaio is nothing more than a political attack.
 
And to offer encouragement to the sheriff, Darla Dawald, representing the Grassfire Nation group, has presented Arpaio with a petition of some 100,000 signatures from people who have declared their support for the law-enforcement officer.
  
Grassfire Nation supports the Patriot Action Network, which calls itself the “nation’s largest conservative social action network, involving tens of thousands of citizens,” including many TEA Party members.

The petition demands DOJ prove its accusations that Arpaio’s office has engaged in a policy to systematically violate the civil rights of Hispanics, which WND has reported DOJ refuses to do.

The petition claims the DOJ investigation is nothing more than a baseless, politically motivated attack on Arpaio.

“Citizens belonging to this grass roots movement who called themselves ‘Grassroots Nation’ have followed the situation and say they feel the federal government has orchestrated an attack on the Sheriff for Obama’s political gain, who hopes to ingratiate himself to the Hispanic American voting block,” the petition read.

The petition’s “Statement of Support” says:

“As a Citizen of the United States, I am declaring my support for Sheriff Joe Arpaio, the sheriff’s lawful practices in prosecuting criminal and his unflinching stand in handling the illegal immigration crisis in his home state of Arizona. I demand that the U.S. Department of Justice release any evidence involving the allegations against Sheriff Joe and his department’s practices. If proven unfounded, I demand an immediate end to the politically motivated witch-hunt against the sheriff and his department, and a public apology from Attorney General Holder.”

A video of the presentation:



At the time, Arpaio noted that not only does he enforce the law, he also has his Cold Case Posse investigating Barack Obama’s birth certificate and eligibility.

Arpaio has scheduled a news conference March 1 in Phoenix to release the findings of the Cold Case Posse that has been investigating Obama’s eligibility.
 
Arpaio’s decision to investigate Obama follows a meeting held in his office Aug. 17, 2011, with TEA Party representatives from Surprise, Ariz., who presented a petition signed by more than 250 Maricopa County residents. The petitioners expressed concern that their voting rights could be irreparably compromised if Obama uses a forged birth certificate to be placed on the 2012 presidential ballot in Arizona or otherwise is found to be ineligible.

WND previously reported that the TEA Party letter formally stated the following charge: “The Surprise TEA Party is concerned that no law enforcement agency or other duly constituted government agency has conducted an investigation into the Obama birth certificate to determine if it is in fact an authentic copy of 1961 birth records on file for Barack Obama at the Hawaii Department of Health in Honolulu, or whether it, or they are forgeries.”

The posse, constituted under the authority of Arpaio’s office, consists of three former law enforcement officers and two retired attorneys with law enforcement experience. It has been examining evidence since September concerning Obama’s eligibility to be president under Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution.

The Cold Case Posse conducting the investigation has been described as a “posse within the posse,” consisting of volunteers with professional experience in conducting investigations. It includes individuals chosen because of their professional backgrounds in law enforcement, lawyers who have participated in criminal or civil cases and individuals with specialized skills in fields ranging from accounting to conducting criminal forensic examination.

The posse was constituted as a 501(c)3 organization, designed to cost the people of Maricopa County nothing, while enabling people from around the country to contribute to its mission.

In total, more than 3,000 volunteers participate in Arpaio’s posse program. The power to constitute posses is authorized to Arizona sheriffs under the state constitution.

Regarding the Department of Justice Investigation, Arpaio has told WND the issue raised by the DOJ is the sheriff’s office treatment of Hispanics. The DOJ alleges there are systematic violations of Hispanics’ federal civil rights.

However, Arpaio’s repeated requests for documentation have not generated a response.

Arpaio told Dewald that he is just doing his job.

“I serve the four million people who live in this county,” he said.

Dewald said the signatures actually represent voices of Americans “who have made a commitment to stand with Sheriff Joe and his policies to protect this great state and the nation.”

Arpaio has contended that a 22-page complaint the DOJ released Dec. 15 is nothing more than anecdotal and did not prove systematic sheriff’s department policies aimed at depriving Hispanics of their civil rights.

Nor was Arpaio concerned that the DOJ might take him and his sheriff’s office to federal court immediately, as it has threatened.

“If the Justice Department wants to take me to court, I’m ready,” Arpaio said at the time.

The sheriff said that if the DOJ “wants to debate the facts instead of fixing the problems stated in our findings, we will do so by way of litigation.”
 


__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
Yephora

Registered:
Posts: 190
Reply with quote  #32 
"I will reveal our... preliminary findings on March 1" (00:44).

Preliminary?

Seriously

Avatar / Picture

Registered:
Posts: 1,060
Reply with quote  #33 
He tweeted that he also received 10,000 signatures from border patrol agents in support of him!

__________________
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." Thomas Jefferson
Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 24,815
Reply with quote  #34 

Arpaio: I briefed Santorum on birth certificate investigation

Jim Acosta is reporting that Joe Arpaio, the sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona, briefed GOP contender Rick Santorum on his investigation into President Barack Obama's birth certificate, the controversial law enforcement official told reporters Tuesday.
 
After a speech to a Republican gathering in Phoenix where Santorum appeared earlier in the day, Arpaio explained he wanted to inform the candidate of his investigation "as a matter of fairness in case he wouldn't want me to support him."

Arpaio said he plans to endorse one of the four remaining GOP candidates in the coming weeks. But the sheriff added he would not make his choice known before he announces the findings of his birth certificate probe at a news conference set for March 1st. This endorsement would be his second in the race; in November 2011, he endorsed then-candidate Rick Perry.

Santorum, he said, seemed to have no problem with the nature of his investigation.
 
"He had no problems with what I told him that I may be doing," Arpaio told reporters.
 
The sheriff said he is conducting the investigation after receiving requests from "the tea party."
 
Arpaio added he believes he is doing the president a favor.
 
"I really started this on the theory that maybe I could clear this mess up," Arpaio told reporters. "Wouldn't it be nice for me to do that?"
 
The White House released the president's birth certificate last year. Officials in Hawaii where Obama was born have verified its authenticity.
 
A federal Department of Justice investigation into Arpaio's office made public in December described "a pervasive culture of discriminatory bias against Latinos at MCSO that reaches the highest levels of the agency."

He dismissed the allegations as a politically-driven "witch hunt."


__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
KheSanh

Registered:
Posts: 233
Reply with quote  #35 
"Arpaio added he believes he is doing the president a favor."

As Claudia has said the word 'posturing' comes to mind.

Why am I getting bad vibes about this?
Claudia

Registered:
Posts: 1,222
Reply with quote  #36 

"FAVOR" --  what kind of a "FAVOR" could Arpiao give to Obama and tell that would make Santorum uncomfortable, other than that he has found nothing of verifiable truth to have him (Obama) disqualified, in other words, he is NOT LOOKING FOR THE TRUTH or the facts, he is pertpetuating the COVER UP for Obama and he has to let Santorum know this before he takes him under his protective wing and endorses him.....  without tearing Obama apart at the seams.

 

and IF he and his team haven't  found anything that will put a stop to Obama, then I KNOW that he has been paid off or totally threatened out of existence by Obama, cause the truth is right in front of EVERYONE'S faces.....  it simply takes someone to be NOT AFRAID OF USING THAT TRUTH and stand tall with honor to make it stick, unless everyone has been paid off and no one will listen or stand up, so that only leads to one conclusion......  AMERICA as we know it is DEAD.

Seriously

Avatar / Picture

Registered:
Posts: 1,060
Reply with quote  #37 
"Arpaio added he believes he is doing the president a favor.
  
"I really started this on the theory that maybe I could clear this mess up," Arpaio told reporters.  "Wouldn't it be nice for me to do that?"
 
That worried me a bit to when I read it.  IF Arpairo hadn't found anything, then I think we would have heard about it before now.  He has something but who knows what.  Read the second part again, really started it thinking he could clear it up.  We'll just have to wait and see.

__________________
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." Thomas Jefferson
KheSanh

Registered:
Posts: 233
Reply with quote  #38 

Seriously, I hope you are right.  I pray you are right.

SigP226

Registered:
Posts: 133
Reply with quote  #39 
Perhaps Arpiao feels if he down-plays the issue he can curry favor with the Administration and get them off his back.  
  
fob

Registered:
Posts: 6
Reply with quote  #40 

Maybe that favor reveals his real dad. A natural born citizen. Unfortunately that makes Barry a natural born liar.

John Doe Sr.

Registered:
Posts: 65
Reply with quote  #41 
The Sheriff's statement did not say anything about him letting Obama off.

I think he is saying he will expose the truth about Obama, giving him a break from the stress of living a lie. Even someone as cold and unfeeling as Obama could get stressed out. Hard to believe hundreds, at times I read even thousands, of people were involved in a 3,000 page report for six months just to say...well, everything is OK.

Maybe he talked to Santorum to see if it was OK if a birther, and depending on what's in the report, maybe THE birther, openly supported him.

I think we should hold our insults and anger with Joe for less than a week and see what is actually in the report.



John Doe Sr.

Registered:
Posts: 65
Reply with quote  #42 
Longknife 21,

Thank you.......................

ballpoint

Avatar / Picture

Registered:
Posts: 65
Reply with quote  #43 

Claudia

Registered:
Posts: 1,222
Reply with quote  #44 

I am always willing to give almost anyone the benefit of the doubt, I just hope that he really comes through with something along the lines of what I already know and has the ability to make it stand and be made to hold......  

John Doe Sr.

Registered:
Posts: 65
Reply with quote  #45 
I understand being skeptical, after all we have been through with this.

I'm keeping my fingers crossed and saying a prayer...only 6 days.

WND is going to have live stream video of the news conference.

http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/wnd-tv-to-live-stream-arpaio-eligibility-report/

Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 24,815
Reply with quote  #46 

Sheriff Joe's March 1 eligibility report press conference live-stream

The Article II Super PAC will be live-streaming Sheriff Joe Arpaio's March 1st here . . .

When Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio announces the findings of the first official law-enforcement investigation into the questions surrounding Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility for office at a news conference Thursday, March 1, WND TV will be there to provide exclusive live-streaming, founder and editor Joseph Farah announced today.
 
In addition, WND will make available to the public, the same day by e-mail, the official report distributed to media by Arpaio’s "Cold Case Posse." Those interested in receiving the report can sign up for the free service between now and the March 1 press conference.
 
"When I took this mission on, I took it on to possibly be able to clear the president," Arpaio said during a speech in Maricopa County. "I was doing him a favor. We’ll see what happens."
 
Arpaio has kept the results of the investigation close to the vest, but suggested in a speech Tuesday that new information would be revealed.
 
"I don’t have press conferences just to get my name on television. When I have a press conference, I talk about something," Arpaio said. "I had about 250 tea party people, to sign a petition . . . came to me and asked their sheriff to investigate Obama and the birth certificate. So what should I do? Throw it in the waste basket and forget it like everybody else has done?"


__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
DrJim

Avatar / Picture

Registered:
Posts: 97
Reply with quote  #47 
Arpaio to release devastating information 
 
From John Albert Dummett Jr, a democratic POTUS candidate who is challenging obama's eligibility....
 
"Sheriff Joe Arpaio is supposed to release devastating information concerning Barrack Obama on March 1st.  He was supposed to release this information in February but has not yet done so.  In early December I met with Arpaio and I know what this information is.  I was sworn to secrecy until Arpaio released the information.  If what he does release does not match what I was told I will set the record st...raight.  The information I know is more than enough reason for Obama not to be President of the United States.  I heard the information from the lead investigator of Arpaio's Cold Case Posse.  I will not allow for any more lies.  I am not your run of the mill everyday politician.  I am a patriot first and will give my life to defend my country.  Every politician running knows the truth too.  So does everyone currently serving in office or sitting on a bench.  I know the truth and why there is a cover up and only agreed until the end of February to remain silent because I was assured the problem would be taken care of.  I will see to it our Constitution and way of life is defended.  Everyone who is following me or is a supporter of mine knows about my dedication to this nation.  They can vouch for my voracity".
 
Next week will be most interesting....
UTJ

Registered:
Posts: 55
Reply with quote  #48 
My previous two posts I removed for inaccuracy. Sorry. However,  I have a concern about the strategy of Liberty Legal in this article from John Albert Dummett Jr. In it he states...

Quote:
We were talking about impeachment and why that is not something we want to do with Barack Obama, and here’s the reason why:


Quote:
If we impeach him and he gets off – and we know he will because he’s appointed two people to the Supreme Court – it will go to the Supreme Court, and those women will not recuse themselves.


Quote:
So if he gets off scot-free, then everything he’s done is set in stone; we’ve set precedent


My concern is, couldn't the DNC, in a faux move impeach Obama, knowing it would fail, set that very precedent and render Article II (5) obsolete? While it would be a more drastic approach, wouldn't it be a similar tactic to vetting McCain's NBC status?


Seriously

Avatar / Picture

Registered:
Posts: 1,060
Reply with quote  #49 
Precedents do not over ride the Constitution.  I disagree with impeachment.
 
1. It would take too long and the Senate would never impeach.
2. Can you impeach an upsur who isn't legally qualified to be President?
3. I would rather see him in handcuffs, along with Pelosi & Reid!


__________________
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." Thomas Jefferson
Claudia

Registered:
Posts: 1,222
Reply with quote  #50 

He can't be Impeached because he was NEVER LEGALLY a pResident to begin with, and if we Impeach we can't UNDO by Null and Void ALL that he has done.  Impeachment just shows that he was doing things wrong, unethical, treason, etc., (unconstitutional),   --  by taking him out of the equation as NOT EVER Having been LEGALLY ELECTED, all of everything that he has signed, in any arena, becomes like it NEVER WAS, or Null & Void..... His footprints would get eradicated because he NEVER WAS THERE,  Quo Warranto, by whose authority and permission are you there and signed what you signed???  He was NEVER LEGAL TO BE  SIGNING ANYTHING by virtue of NOT complying with Art II, Sec 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution... Not an  NBC per the Law of the Land and of the Nation.

Previous Topic | Next Topic
Print
Reply

Help fight the
ObamaMedia

The United States Library of Congress
has selected TheObamaFile.com for inclusion
in its historic collection of Internet materials

Be a subscribing
member

© Copyright  Beckwith  2011 - 2016
All rights reserved