Help fight the
liberal media

click title for home page
  
Be a subscriber

────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
The stuff you won't see in the liberal media (click "Replies" for top stories)
Calendar Chat
 
 
 


Reply
  Author   Comment  
Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 23,051
Reply with quote  #1 

Today -- Capt. Pamela Barnett to argue at Noonan v Obama demurrer hearing

GeorgeM is reporting that the Forces of Evil argued to dismiss the case. We are trying to keep it alive. Plaintiff and presidential candidate Ed Noonan is represented by Gary Kreep. Pamela is speaking for the rest of us. Gary is also representing presidential candidate John Dummett in another CA ballot challenge case.

Here is the tentative ruling, which doesn’t look good:
 
Basically, the judge is saying CA Secretary of State Bowen has no responsibility to vet candidates, even though she’s done it before and the US Supreme Courts says she has a “ministerial duty” to do so.  He refused to strike down Elections Code Section 6901, which illegally says they don’t have to.  He totally ignored the SCOTUS Minor v Happersett ruling, which defines a natural born Citizen as one born in the USA to two American citizen parents at the time of that birth, claiming CA doesn’t have to vet, even though they do, when it suits them.  He also ignored evidence of a forged birth certificate and that Obama had failed to establish his eligibility, saying only Congress can decide. Congress and Federal courts have refused to do so, to date. Well, at least he didn’t cite Ankeny.  So, we’ll have to decide what to do next if he rules thusly. Don’t know if Kreep plans to stay for an appeal.  This is like Alice in Wonderland. Rule of law and the Constitution are only a distant memory.


__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
Claudia

Registered:
Posts: 1,186
Reply with quote  #2 

what happened to the ELECTION CODE LAW that stated that any hearings/cases had to be BEFORE THE BALLOTS WERE PRINTED.......???? 

"He pointed out that Election Code §13314 states the any challenge needs to be before the ballots are printed.
(a)(1) An elector may seek a writ of mandate alleging that an error or omission has occurred, or is about to occur, in the placing of a name on, or in the printing of, a ballot, sample ballot, voter pamphlet, or other official matter, or that any neglect of duty has occurred, or is about to occur."
 
I understand that "they" WROTE the CODE or amended it through the years, (actually I think the Code in Calif has always been pretty much the same, as I voted in Calif for at least 15 years before moving to Nevada) and have made that the de facto rule in California, but why then do the very same people that took office by its useage deny that it is pertinent???  Could it be that there is a treasonous conspiracy afoot???  Maybe California Government should declare itself as seceding from the WE THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Union......  as "they" are clearly not abiding by the very laws and rules that they have set up for the WE THE PEOPLE of CALIFORNIA......


Even I, as a novice in the political world, know that the laws and rules are NOT TO BE BENT FOR SPECIAL PURPOSE, all of them are to be followed and legal suggestions are to be held sacrosanct, and everyone is supposed to abide by the same ones, not special rules or laws for this person and other special rules and laws for the person two doors down the hall.....  e plurbis unum...  "out of many - ONE....."  all people abide by the same laws thereby making them useful for all.  Laws and Gov Suggestions for Bills and Rules of Conduct are NOT to be parsed and made up or chopped up at will for whatever purpose if the real Law, Rule, Bill or Suggestion does not fit the immediate situation that someone inside the Gov doesn't want to honor.

Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 23,051
Reply with quote  #3 

California ballot challenge hijinks

Edward C. Noonan asks, will the corruption never cease?

We (the California 7) each got a copy today (Saturday, May 5, 2012) of the Dummett v Bowen filing from the DOJ. I was highly amused at the corruption that is apparent on page one of both the Memo of P & A of Bowen’s Demurrer and their Notice of Demurrer. This proof of corruption is found on the DATE line of both documents… It states, DATE: OCTOBER 26, 2012.
 
Gee gang! That’s a whole 5 months away! Wasn’t I told, or didn’t I read that a Writ of Mandate took precedence over everything?
 
Five months away and about 10 days before the general election in the first week of November!
 
I think the Judge is telliing us "birthers" something… Something like go screw yourself!

DOJ Demurrer

 


__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 23,051
Reply with quote  #4 

Obama not qualified to be on California ballot

GeorgeM says a news conference is being held by Edward C. Noonan, a candidate for President from the American Independent Party at 1:00 pm on Tuesday, March 27, 2012, on the California State Capitol steps, in Sacramento, California.
 
Two groups of Californians are now suing California Secretary of State Debra Bowen to force her to validate that Mr. Barack Obama has the mandated qualifications to be on the Primary ballot in 2012 as a presidential candidate, or else she must remove Mr. Obama as a candidate entirely. As of this date, she has declared that, as the head Elections clerk of California, it is not her duty to qualify presidential candidates for office. It is her duty to only qualify state and other federal candidates. The suing parties dispute this claim, and affirm that since state electors from each state must be qualified to act in such electors, she is also responsible to qualify and certify each presidential candidate as well.
 
The California Election Code states that it is the duty of the Secretary of State to validate and qualify all write-in candidates for President which evidences a duty for her to do the same for non-write-in Candidates.
 
A six month criminal investigation was conducted on the qualifications of Mr. Obama to run as a candidate for the Office of the President of the United States. The investigation concluded with the statement that no legitimate American birth certificate has been found for Mr. Obama. There are questions at to the citizenship of Mr. Obama.
 
Obama reported in his autobiography that he traveled to Pakistan in 1981. No U.S. Passport record can be found during this period for him. It is rumored that he used either a British Passport or an Indonesian Passport. He is seemingly a citizen of one or both countries.
 
A news conference is being held by Edward C. Noonan, a candidate for President from the American Independent Party at 1:00 pm on Tuesday, March 27, 2012, on the California State Capitol steps, in Sacramento, California. Another news conference organized by John Dummett a Republican candidate for President will be held jointly by the two candidates. Both candidates claim that they are being defrauded by having a non-American running on the same ballot as they are.  In attendance at both press conferences will be Gary Kreep, Executive Director of the United States Justice Foundation, who is currently representing Mr. Dummett and his fellow Petitioners in their litigation, and is being substituted this week into Mr. Noonan’s lawsuit this week to represent him and his fellow Petitioners.
 
"If Mr. Obama is indeed a U.S. Citizen, and he was born in one of the 50 states, he should be able to prove such a birth without bogus forged copies of such certificates." said Mr. Noonan.
 
Mr. Noonan continued, "I am suing Mr. Obama in court to force him to comply with the U.S. Constitution and to prove that he is a natural born citizen." And he continued, "A presidential candidate is required to prove that both of his parents were U.S. Citizens prior to his birth, and secondly, he needs to prove that he was born on U.S. soil."
 
"So far, I have only seen a Kenyan birth certificate that looks legitimate. We can’t get a court anywhere in America to allow "discovery" on this matter. So the ballot challenges continue in state after state" Mr. Noonan said.

Contact:
 
Edward C. Noonan for President 2012
 
530-845-5186 or 1-760-788-6624

This refers to case 34-2012-80001048


__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 23,051
Reply with quote  #5 

"California 7" hearing set for Friday, March 23

GeorgeM says you haven't heard much about it, by design, by all parties. 
 
•  The Peoples' Republik of Kal-ee-Fornia/Secretary of State Debra Bowen doesn't want you to know that they should be vetting candidates, but aren't.

•  Obama's people don't want you to know that he's ineligible and what dastardly tricks they are pulling to keep him in power, while the nation is being "fundamentally transformed” by his radical administration. 
 
•  The "Califonia 7" plaintiffs have kept a low profile, to not attract a lot of opposition attention.
 
We have been doing it "pro se" -- with no lawyer. Old saying: He/she who defends self in court has a fool for a client. Pamela Barnett, our Director, has done most of the heavy lifting legal work and she's no fool, but an attorney would be most helpful.  Your contributions are badly needed to engage Larry Klayman, who is working on another case for us.

We are suing to:
 
•  Get "Obama” off the ballot for primary and general election
 
•  Stay the printing of ballots until this is resolved
 
•  Freeze all Obama fundraising in California
 
We had a planning hearing on Friday. The judge just sluffed it off. They just do not care about it. What I was seeing is scary.”  Pamela "declined to comment” on this.
 
Peruse these case documents to get a feel for things:  
   
You know that California and Florida are two of the largest electoral vote states -- "Obama” cannot afford to lose either one. Even the threat of losing one will make them frantic. Win or lose, we want to expose who the Marxist Usurper really is, his dark, sordid past and toxic associates/belief systems. Along the way, we are documenting crimes committed by him and his lackey enablers in government, political parties and private sector, for future legal and publicity use. Please help us.
 
Thanks,
 
"California 7"
 
Hearing is Friday 3/23/12, at 9 AM

CA Superior Court, Sacramento, CA
GORDON D SCHABER COURTHOUSE

720 9th St., Sacramento
CASE NO: 34-2012-80001048


__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 23,051
Reply with quote  #6 

Sacramento – A legal complaint was served on Obama for America (California) and the California Secretary of State Debra Bowen late Tuesday to keep British-born Barack Obama off the ballot for the Office of the President, because he does not meet the Constitutional requirement of being a U.S. Natural Born citizen according to the Supreme Court precedent Minor v. Happersett.   The legal action was filed Jan. 6 in Sacramento Superior Court by a group of 7 ad hoc registered voters including an American Independent Party candidate for President.

Several of the petitioners tried seeking resolution against Obama after the 2008 presidential election, but they were told by the California courts that it was too late to make challenges to Obama’s legitimacy, and that they did not have “standing”.

The Writ requests a temporary restraining order of Respondent Debra Bowen (SOS) to bar Obama on the Democratic Party ballot in the primary and/or General Election until the matter of eligibility and ballot access for Respondent Obama is heard. The Writ also requested a temporary restraining order against Respondent Obama and or his agents associated with the Obama for America California from further fundraising in California until further notice by the court. A final demand was for a permanent Injunction against Respondent Obama and Respondent SOS as to Respondent Obama’s ineligibility, barring him from ballot access.

Seven California voters have drawn up the Writ of Mandate over the absence of Constitutional authority and documentation that Barack Obama is eligible to occupy the Oval Office. No dual nationality citizen has ever been declared a U.S. NATURAL BORN Citizen. The Supreme Court ruled in Minor v. Happersett that a person must be born within the jurisdiction of the U.S. to two U.S. citizen parents and it has been never been overturned. The U.S. Congress in 2009 usurped the U.S. Constitution when they confirmed Mr. Obama for the Office of the Presidency. They attempted to revise the U.S. Constitution without an Amendment by confirming Obama as POTUS.

One of the seven California Petitioners is Edward C. Noonan of Olivehurst, Yuba County, CA. He is currently a 2012 Presidential candidate for the American Independent Party.

The other six California petitioners are Pamela Barnett (Director of ObamaBallotChallenge.com), Sharon Chickering, George Miller, Tony Dolz, Neil Turner, and Gary Wilmott. All seven petitioners are affirmed as Ad Hoc registered voters of California, each self represented without an attorney.

The cause of the petition is that Mr. Barack Obama does not qualify for the Office of President of the United States because both of his parents were not U.S. Citizens at the time of Obama’s birth. Article II of the US Constitution states that only Natural Born Citizens qualify for the Office of President. Barack Obama’s father was a foreign national of Kenya. This disqualifies Mr. Obama to be Commander in Chief as well as POTUS.

Mr. Noonan said, “Mr. Obama cannot be a natural born citizen.” “It doesn’t matter whether or not he was born in Hawaii, it is a fact that his father was not a citizen of the U.S. at the time of Obama’s birth which disqualifies Mr. Obama from holding the Office,” he said.

“I have a right as a Petitioner to have standing and relief with the California Secretary of State’s Elections Division because I am candidate for 2012 Presidential Campaign,” he said. “The California Elections Code Section §13314 guarantees me the right to challenge the qualifications of Mr. Obama.”

He pointed out that Election Code §13314 states the any challenge needs to be before the ballots are printed.

(a)(1) An elector may seek a writ of mandate alleging that an error or omission has occurred, or is about to occur, in the placing of a name on, or in the printing of, a ballot, sample ballot, voter pamphlet, or other official matter, or that any neglect of duty has occurred, or is about to occur.

He also said, “We are attempting to correct the errors, omissions, or other neglects of the SOS that are in violation of the Election Code and the US Constitution.”

Mr. Noonan said, “If Mr. Obama is not a Natural Born Citizen as the US Constitution demands of all candidates for US President to be, then this violates the US Constitution.”

Neil Turner, one of the seven petitioners stated, “They, the Congress, Supreme Court and the White House, in fact apparently conspired to revise the U.S. Constitution without an Amendment, by attempting to eliminate the requirement that a President be a NATURAL BORN Citizen.”

Pamela Barnett, Retired Captain, also one of the seven petitioners said, “The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals told me that I did not have standing to challenge Obama regarding his eligibility after the election in 2008, so I am now part of a legal action to require the California court to rule on Obama’s eligibility for the first time.”

“We have been trying to have Obama’s eligibility heard in court on the merits for 3 years, but citizens were denied standing after the election in 2008. California has a statute that gives us standing before the ballots are printed. We hope that our judge will honor the Constitution and California law and have a fair hearing on the merits and rule on existing Natural Born law,” said Barnett.

“This is about the rule of law. No man should be above it. We need to honor the Constitution,” Barnett said.

Barnett was one of the original litigants in the 2009 legal action Barnett, Alan Keyes v. Obama.

This new, current challenge is only one of the dozens that Mr. Obama is facing across the country regarding his failure to meet the Constitutional requirements for the Office of President of the United States.

Go here to view the complaint.  

For more info contact:

Edward Noonan -- 530-845-5186

And visit these websites:

http://obamaballotchallenge.com/minor-v-happersett-proof-obama-is-unlawful-president

http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
  


__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Print
Reply

Help fight the
ObamaMedia

The United States Library of Congress
has selected TheObamaFile.com for inclusion
in its historic collection of Internet materials

Be a subscriber

© Copyright  Beckwith  2011 - 2017
All rights reserved