Help fight the
liberal media

click title for home page
  
Be a subscriber

────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
The stuff you won't see in the liberal media (click "Replies" for top stories)
Calendar Chat
 
 
 


Reply
  Author   Comment  
Seriously

Avatar / Picture

Registered:
Posts: 1,042
Reply with quote  #1 

Another video that has been removed....

I found another copy . . .


__________________
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." Thomas Jefferson
Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 23,051
Reply with quote  #2 

Floyd Brown on Obama's Social Security numbers

A ton of information about Obama's multiple Social Security numbers and addresses can be found here . . .

Even the federal government's own Social Security Number validation system has a problem with Obama's SSN:

[ObamaSSNDiscrepancy]

E-Verify is an Internet-based system operated by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) in partnership with the Social Security Administration (SSA).  E-Verify is currently free to employers and is available in all 50 states.  E-Verify provides an automated link to federal databases to help employers determine employment eligibility of new hires and the validity of their Social Security numbers.

If you were an employer and entered Barack Hussein Obama’s social security number 042-68-4425 into the data base to verify that he was eligible for employment in the United States you could not legally hire him.

Yet, he occupies the Oval Office.


__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 23,051
Reply with quote  #3 

Ohio thwarts Obama SSN challenge

Jack Cashill says if the major media employed just a few people as relentless and resourceful as Ohio-based private investigator Susan Daniels, Barack Obama would not have been elected to a second term. Hell, he would not have been elected to a first term.
 
Daniels had filed suit challenging Ohio Secretary of State John Husted to determine if Obama has been using a legitimate Social Security Number. Daniels contended that without such confirmation Obama was not eligible to appear on the Ohio presidential ballot in 2012.

A state-licensed private investigator since 1995, Daniels had discovered in 2009 that Obama has been using a "fraudulent Connecticut Social Security Number" and that he had been doing so since he was 25. Daniels said as much in her suit.
 
On Sept. 12, 2012, a hearing was held on this matter in Geauga County, Ohio, Common Pleas Court before Judge David L. Fuhry. Husted blew it off. When no attorney appeared to represent him at the hearing, Fuhry asked the bailiff at least twice if she had heard from anyone in Husted's office. She had not.
 
According to the Geauga County trial guidelines, counsel is "expected to be present and ready to enter the courtroom at the time scheduled for trial." Husted's absence, however, did not appear to overly bother the judge.
 
Fuhry gave Daniels two choices. He could continue the hearing for a week until he could rule on a defense motion to dismiss, or Daniels could elect to continue with the hearing that day. Daniels chose the latter option.
 
"I will take your evidence today, or anything additional you wish to say in support of your motion," Fuhry told Daniels at the beginnings of the proceedings, but he did not quite honor that pledge.
 
Fuhry particularly objected to an amicus brief I had written in support of Daniels' suit. "In doing the research for my 2011 book 'Deconstructing Obama' and in subsequent research," I wrote, "I could find no instance in which Barack Obama claimed to have even visited the state of Connecticut, let alone resided there."
 
Fuhry asked Daniels repeatedly whether this was "evidence." Twice she said it was an "exhibit." When he asked her again, she presumed the words were interchangeable and said, "Well, then, I guess it is." Fuhry responded, "Then you cannot enter it because it is hearsay."
 
This exchange troubled Daniels' supporters who had attended the hearing. To them, it seemed clear that Fuhry was openly badgering her. Someone official may have had second thoughts about the exchange as well because it was purged from the official "true and correct" transcript.
 
Throughout the hearing Fuhry shocked Daniels by assuming the role of defense attorney. In the formal complaint she brought against him, Daniels described his demeanor as "dismissive, intimidating, belittling."

Daniels noted that Fuhry had violated several precepts of the Ohio Code of Judicial Conduct, which demands that a judge perform his duties "impartially and diligently" and that he be "patient, dignified, and courteous."
 
There is nothing about Daniels' personality that should have provoked the judge. She is a soft-spoken septuagenarian, a widow and mother of seven. She is, however, a truth-seeker, and, in the age of Obama, the establishment has little tolerance of the same.
 
It will not surprise to learn that Judge Fuhry dismissed Daniels' suit, ruling that she had no "statutory authority" to bar the Democratic nominee from appearing on the ballot.

In the grievance she filed against Fuhry, Daniels responded that she had at the very least made the judge aware that a crime may have been committed. According to state law, he had the responsibility to request an investigation. He did not.
 
"I also have reason to believe that Judge Fuhry had his decision drafted before the hearing was held," wrote Daniels, and she was likely correct.
 
Unfortunately, it didn't matter. "Upon review of your grievance," wrote the assistant disciplinary counsel for the Supreme Court of Ohio in a painfully brief letter, "we do not note any evidence of conduct constituting a violation of the code by Judge Fuhry."

"They sure do all stick together," Daniels wrote to me in her last communication. "Thick as thieves," I answered.

Cros-posted in the "Ohio Obama ballot challenge" thread


__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 23,051
Reply with quote  #4 

Barack H. Obama -- AKA Harrison J. Bounel -- Deadbeat and tax fraud

The plot thickens with Barack Obama's known identity theft schemes: Debt Collector; Obama's Social Security number reserved for Connecticut applicants also tied to an alias Harrison J Bounel. The debt collector interviewed by True News, aired on TruNews Radio 5/18/2011, also claims Obama has used two other Social Security numbers in Illinois. This interview covers several issues ranging from Obama's Social Security number to his property tax filings in Chicago to 50+ different addresses tied to Obama and Michelle across the country.

1) Someone used a fake property identification number to secure a $1.34 million Fannie May/ Freddie Mac "poverty" loan on Barack Obama's Illinois mansion.
 
2) Barack Obama's mansion moved through a trust company called Northern Trust, and has had six (6) different property identification numbers. All real estate is supposed to have only one (1) PIN. Someone was trying very hard to conceal the train of ownership of Obama's Illinois mansion.
 
3) The above mentioned property scheme is called "layered ownership." The Illinois law firm Obama worked for specialized in "layered ownership".
 
4) Evidently, Barack Obama, using the false identity "Harrison J. Bounel", secured a loan and then "skipped" - i.e., disappeared with the intention of never paying the loan back.
 
The information here has been cross-checked and verified by two independent professional private investigators.
 
http://www.archive.org/details/ObamasFakeSocialSecurityNumberIdentity-TaitzVAstrue
 
http://www.archive.org/details/P.i.SusanDanielsInterviewAboutObamasIdentityFraud
 
http://www.archive.org/details/Demonstration-ObamaswhiteHouseIssueBirthCertificateABlatantForgery
 
http://www.archive.org/details/WashingtonTimes-NewlyReleasedObamaBirthCertificateForgery
 
http://www.archive.org/details/ObamasNewwhiteHouseIssueBirthCertificate-RealOrAnotherFake
 
http://www.archive.org/details/ElectionsOfficialAdamsAffidavitAttestingNoHawaiiBirthRecordForObama
 
http://www.archive.org/details/BarackObama-BornInKenya-TheDocumentary
 
Related:
Obama appoints his accountant who is also the individual who pays the taxes for the Obama on his supposed home in Chicago to a key post in his Administration.
 
Obama announced his intent to appoint the following individual to a key Administration post:
 
Harvey S. Wineberg, Appointee for Member, President’s Advisory Council on Financial Capability

Harvey S. Wineberg is the founding partner of Wineberg Solheim Howell & Shain, P.C., a Chicago based CPA firm offering a wide range of accounting and financial services to individuals and small businesses. Mr. Wineberg is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and has been designated by them as a Personal Financial Specialist and is a member of the Illinois Society of Certified Public Accountants. He is also a member of the Illinois Bar. For 30 years he served as a Director and member of the Audit Committee of the Mid-Town Bank of Chicago. He was also President of the Board of the Roger Baldwin Foundation of the Illinois ACLU, a member of the Columbus Hospital of Chicago Foundation Board, and served as the Treasurer of President Obama’s 2004 Senate campaign. In 1998, Mr. Wineberg authored a book about his life and his practice entitled “Thanks For Your Trust.” He served in the U.S. Navy as a Commissary and Fiscal Officer.
 
Q: Is it not illegal or unethical to appoint the individual who pays the taxes on the supposed Obama home in Chicago, the individual whose accounting firm handles the Obama’s taxes, and who is listed as a supposed owner of 5046 S Greenwood Ave., the Obama’s supposed home address to a key Administration post in the US Government?


__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
Claudia

Registered:
Posts: 1,186
Reply with quote  #5 
maybe, it seems to me, that some of the stuff that we have been trying to have get traction, may now be starting to come to the surface..... because the rats are going to start fleeing the sinking ship of state.  Thanks to those of us out in this lopsided world who have not given up on the truth......
Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 23,051
Reply with quote  #6 

Susan Daniels gets court hearing

Helen Tansey says what is flying under the radar, and cannot be disputed, is Obama’s use of a Social Security Number (SSN) issued in the spring of 1977 with it first appearing on his Selective Service Registration of which he applied on September 4, 1980. There are serious problems with this SSN with the first being it appears to have been originally assigned to another individual born in 1890, and secondly, when verified using several Social Security Administration verifying databases it is rejected as "NOT FOUND IN THE SOCIAL SECURITY INDEX" and finally it is a Connecticut issued SSN; a state in which Obama was not living in at the age of 15.  This SSN has been tied to Obama’s State Senate and US Senate offices and his private residents, as well as land line phone numbers since coming stateside to attend Occidental College in California.
 
Now that Donald Trump has crowned himself a "birther" he too is making it abundantly clear to any and all who will dare listen that the digital Certification of Live Birth (COLB) is meaningless, because it is and always has been, but he needs to widen his scope of interest to include the oddities permeating around the President’s Social Security Number. For nearly two years now, the SSN peculiarities have percolated just below the dubious Certification of Live Birth, and it it has yet to bubble up to the top as being more significant in undoing the fabricated tale Bill Ayers wove together in Obama’s two autobiographies. More importantly, you can’t change a SSN record, but you can certainly create a long-form birth certificate just in time for the 2012 elections. Which is what many are anticipating, and now with Donald Trump entering the fray you can count on such a document entering into the public arena and soon. Afterall, anyone who has studied this issue knows the Obama camps next step is to embarass the "Birthers" by producing a long-form birth certificate. That would be checkmate wouldn’t it? Of course, it will be a scanned copy just like the COLB, because it will never hold up under the scrutiny of an independent forensic review team of experts, that is someone other than his former employer, the Annenberg’s,  so get ready for a repeat of a similar ruse coming to a computer screen near you.
 
There is good news though, and that is, thanks to the tenaciousness of many professional and amateur investigators, who appear to be working independently of one another, have created a hard trail of solid evidence that cannot be undone. As a matter of record, these investigators have only just begun their work; especially into the many different addresses that are associated with Obama’s SSN.

Daniels v Ohio - Obama Social Security Number Challenge - Court Hearing Date - 8/12/2012

Susan Daniels explains the details of her investigation here . . .

Cross-posted here . . .

__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
Longknife 21

Registered:
Posts: 2,024
Reply with quote  #7 
Beckwith didn't want the reference to this scuzzy scandal sheet in the Washington Times thread.

Rightly so!

I posted it because I think it is a major Smack-Down for Obozo:

How many Globe readers do you think voted for Obozo in 2008?  75%?  85%?

I suspect the 'Globe Readership Contingency' is a major Lib/Dem/Prog Voting Block.

Also, how many of them have been charged, or had a family member charged, with some kind of paperwork or identity fraud?  Obama gets a pass, did they?

And this story Patriots didn't have to pay for !!!   LOL!
Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 23,051
Reply with quote  #8 

Obama Using Dead Man's Social Security Number

The Sheeple's Media is starting to pay attention, they will sell any scandal:
 

The White House is reeling over a bombshell lawsuit that accuses  Barack Obama of using a fake Social Security card belonging to a dead man born in 1890 -- and demands that his name be removed from the ballot in Ohio.  Get more details about the shocking fraud discovered by a private eye and find out why First Lady Michelle is "in a panic," all in this issue of GLOBE.

Originally posted by Longknife 21


__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 23,051
Reply with quote  #9 

Detective probes Obama Social Security mystery -- files suit in Ohio


__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
Yephora

Registered:
Posts: 188
Reply with quote  #10 
I keep hoping for a razor sharp Alan Dershowitz type to come alongside her and help. Hasn't happened though. She's got the goods just not the presentation.
Claudia

Registered:
Posts: 1,186
Reply with quote  #11 

at least she keeps on hammering, you gotta give her credit for that, but I sure do wish that she would get someone better to actually stand up and present the cases.....

Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 23,051
Reply with quote  #12 
Taitz persists with demand for Obama's stolen Social Security number data

GeorgeM  says Orly is continuing to pressure the Social Security Administration to release info on the most famous SSN in history: 042-68-4425, allegedly (and almost certainly) used by Obama on his draft registration, at least one tax return and multiple financial transactions. They previously denied her demand on “privacy” grounds, as if AKA “Obama’s” privacy trumped the security of the United States of America and uncovering a felony.

Orly has done more work to capitalize on the valuable research done by Susan Daniels, Neil Sankey, John Sampson and Linda Jordan, than anyone else. Until just recently, even Sheriff Joe’s Posse didn’t mention the SSN fraud, but they started recently.

She points out that Astrue and judges may be guilty under the same fraud laws that should be convicting “Obama.”

Taitz has now made alternate proposals, such as providing enough info to rule out certain things, without specifically identifying a specific person.

“… a thief does not have privacy rights in keeping private stolen identification papers.”

“Actions by Appellee Astrue, U.S. attorneys defending him and judge Lamberth himself are so outrageous, that they represent criminal complicity and collusion wi th Obama to defraud the whole nation.”

“so far attorney General of the US, Attorney General Holder is not taking any action.”

United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 ( 197 4) the United States found that President Nixon did not have an expectation of privacy and had to release the Watergate tapes, which were actually:
 
a. his
b. private
 
- Orly Taitz

Petition for Rehearing en Banc

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Taitz-v-Astrue-Petition-for-En-Banc-Hearing1.pdf


__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
Beckwith

Super Moderators
Registered:
Posts: 23,051
Reply with quote  #13 

Dr. Alan Keyes and others discuss Obama's problematic Social Security Number(s) and the need for an investigation.  The hosts feel Obama will not be asked to be a spokesman for Life Lock Identity Theft services any time soon.


__________________
A man that lies about who he is will never have a problem lying about what he does
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Print
Reply

Help fight the
ObamaMedia

The United States Library of Congress
has selected TheObamaFile.com for inclusion
in its historic collection of Internet materials

Be a subscriber

© Copyright  Beckwith  2011 - 2017
All rights reserved